Abstract
The purpose of the article was to study an effective strategies for addressing academic misconduct in universities and their practical implementation. An analysis was conducted of universities in various countries, including the USA, Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, and South Korea, alongside a review of internal university documents outlining strategies and procedures for preventing academic misconduct. The findings of this study provided an analysis of the main factors that contribute to dishonest behaviour among students and faculty members. Furthermore, the research defined the concept of “academic misconduct”, and identifies its key elements, types, and the reasons why it occurs. The study also identified effective methods for preventing academic misconduct, including the use of technology to verify the authenticity of academic work, the introduction of honour codes, the implementation of educational campaigns, and ethics training. Fostering a culture of academic integrity and collaboration among all participants in the educational process remains a priority. Each country employs distinct methods to combat and prevent breaches of academic integrity. Recognising academic decommunisation as an integral part of the higher education system contributes to the development of intellectual and ethical culture among students and researchers. Variations in academic integrity requirements for students, lecturers, and researchers are reflected in differing levels of accountability for violations, based on an examination of international experience and practices. The study presented recommendations for improving existing approaches and developing new strategies to enhance academic integrity in educational institutions. The findings may be utilised by university lecturers to refine the educational process
Keywords
academic integrity; educational standards; requirements; international experience; ethical values; accountability for violations
References
- Ainsworth, C., Chernoff, W.A., Chae, Y.J., & Bisciglia, M. (2023). Examining academic dishonesty in online group chats through the lenses of strain and neutralization theories. Deviant Behavior, 45(3), 361-376. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2248337.
- Akhtar, H., & Firdiyanti, R. (2023). Predicting academic dishonesty based on competitive orientation and motivation: Do learning modes matter?. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 11(3), 439-447. doi: 10.23947/2334-8496-2023-11-3-439-447.
- Araya, P., Orellana, S., Alucema, A., Guevara, Z., & Fernández, E. (2023). Factors that threaten the academic integrity of chemistry and pharmacy students at a Chilean university. Educación Médica, 24(6), article number 100825. doi: 10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100825.
- Byungura, J.C., Hansson, H., Masengesho, K., & Karunaratne, T. (2019). Plagiarism tendencies and contributing factors in e-learning environments: Rwandan higher education context. In Proceeedings of the 18th European conference on e-learning (pp. 109-118). Copenhagen: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
- Che Ku Kassim, C.K.H., & Mohd Sallem, N.R. (2023). Intention to deceive: Undergraduates’ perception of fraudulent excuse-making. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 55-69. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-10-2021-0410.
- Constantinos, M.K., Nafsika, A., & Ioanna, V. (2023). Personality profile differences in academic dishonesty and procrastination among Greek university students: A five factor facet-level latent profile analysis. Personality |and Individual Differences, 214, article number 112337. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112337.
- Cotton, D.R.E., Cotton, P.A., & Shipway, J.R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
- Davies, P.M., Alotaishan, R.M.T., Alabdulwahed, H.K.A., Fahim Khan, A.M., Ateya, R.M., Alkhamis, T.S., & Abdullah, A.A. (2023). Perspectives on cyberlearning: A case study by students, about students. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 9731-9745. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11564-w.
- Denisova-Schmidt, E., Huber, M., & Prytula, Y. (2019). The effects of anti-corruption videos on attitudes toward corruption in a Ukrainian online survey. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 60(3), 304-332. doi: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1667844.
- Djokovic, R., Janinovic, J., Pekovic, S., Vuckovic, D., & Blecic, M. (2022). Relying on technology for countering academic dishonesty: The impact of online tutorial on students’ perception of academic misconduct. Sustainability, 14(3), article number 1756. doi: 10.3390/su14031756.
- Dudarev, I., & Purtov, V. (2024). System of comprehensive evaluation of academic staff activity. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 10(4), 24-40. doi: 10.52534/msu-pp4.2024.24.
- Fendler, R., Beard, D., & Godbey, J. (2024). A robust examination of cheating on unproctored online exams. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(5), 26-38. doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.5.3173.
- Flora Xuhua He, F., Fanaian, M., Zhang, N., Lea, X., Geale, S., Gielis, L., Razaghi, K., & Evans, A. (2024). Academic dishonesty in university nursing students: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 154, article number 104752. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104752.
- Harvard University. (2024). Retrieved from https://atlasedu.com.ua/ua/universities/harvard-university/.
- Holubnycha, L. (2022). E-Learning at the tertiary level in and after pandemic. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 48, 47-60. doi: 10.15388/ActPaed.2022.48.3.
- Kadayam Guruswami, G., Mumtaz, S., Gopakumar, A., Khan, E., Abdullah, F., & Parahoo, S. (2023). Academic integrity perceptions among health-professions’ students: A cross-sectional study in the middle east. Journal Academic Ethics, 21, 231-249. doi: 10.1007/s10805-022-09452-6.
- Kavadella, A., Dias da Silva, M.A., Kaklamanos, E.G., Stamatopoulos, V., & Giannakopoulos, K. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT’s real-life implementation in undergraduate dental education: Mixed methods study. JMIR Medical Education, 10, article number e51344. doi: 10.2196/51344.
- Kell, C.M., Thandar, Y., Bhundoo, A.D., Haffejee, F., Mbhele, B., & Ducray, J. (2024). Academic integrity in the information age: Insights from health sciences students at a South African University. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 17(7), 16-28. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0565.
- Kokkinos, C.M., Antoniadou, N., & Voulgaridou, I. (2023). Academic dishonesty among Greek University students from different disciplines: A latent profile analysis of cheating perceptions and academic self-handicapping. Ethics & Behavior, 34(5), 327-341. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2023.2216816.
- Kumar, S., Dabgotra, A., & Mukherjee, D. (2023). Latent class analysis of multigroup heterogeneity in propensity for academic dishonesty. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 48(1), 81-99. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2023.2179999.
- Ladera-Castañeda, M., León-Málaga, F., Espinoza-Olórtegui, M., Nicho-Valladares, M., Cervantes-Ganoza, L., Verastegui-Sandoval, A., Solis-Dante, F., Castro-Rojas, M., & Cayo-Rojas, C. (2023). Factors associated with the perception of university professors about academic dishonesty in dental students from two peruvian universities: Analysis under multivariable regression model. BMC Medical Education, 23, article number 297. doi: 10.1186/s12909023-04281-6.
- Miranda-Rodríguez, R.A., Sánchez-Nieto, J.M., & Ruiz-Rodríguez, A.K. (2024). Effectiveness of intervention programs in reducing plagiarism by university students: A systematic review. Frontiers Education, 9, article number 1357853. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1357853.
- Omari, E., Salifu Yendork, J., & Ankrah, E. (2023). University students’ perspectives on the benefits and challenges of emergency remote teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6093-6113. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11401-0.
- Orok, E., Adeniyi, F., Williams, T., Dosunmu, J., Ikpe, F., Orakwe, C., & Kukoyi, O. (2023). Causes and mitigation of academic dishonesty among healthcare students in a Nigerian university. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19, article number 13. doi: 10.1007/s40979-023-00135-2.
- Rua, T., Lawter, L., & Andreassi, J. (2024). The ethical student scale: Development of a new measure. Organization Management Journal, 21(3), 118-129. doi: 10.1108/OMJ-03-2023-1831.
- Saujan, I. (2023). Awareness of copyright infringement among undergraduates of The State Universities in Sri Lanka. The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 3(1), article number 3. doi: 10.54828/ijsls.2023v3n1.3.
- Seoul National University (SNU), Gwanak Campus. (2024). Retrieved from https://en.snu.ac.kr/.
- Sweeney, S. (2023). Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – considerations regarding contract and AI in higher education. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), article number 100818. doi: 10.1016/jijme.2023.100818.
- The University of Tokyo. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/.
- Trynus, O. (2020). Academic integrity: Challenges of modernity. UNESCO Chair Journal Lifelong Professional Education in the XXI Century, 1, 69-72. doi: 10.35387/ucj.1(1).2020.69-72.
- UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2024). Retrieved from https://whc.unesco.org.
- University of Melbourne. (2024). Retrieved from https://atlasedu.com.ua/ua/universities/university-of-melbourne/.
- University of Munich. (2024). Retrieved from https://surl.li/pboeiy.
- University of Oxford. (2024). Retrieved from https://atlasedu.com.ua/ua/universities/university-of-oxford/.
- Zeb, A., Ullah, R., & Karim, R. (2024). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(1), 99-111. doi: 10.1108/IJILT042023-0046.
- Zhao, L., Peng, J., Yang, X., Yan, W., Ke, S., Batool, K., & Lee, K. (2023). Effects of academic dishonesty policy reminder on university students’ exam cheating – a double-blind randomized controlled experimental field study. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 592-608. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2023.2246073.