Abstract
Teachers’ digital competence is key to preparing students for the digital age. It is not only computer skills, but also the creation of interactive learning, assessment and collaboration. The aim of the study was to assess the level of information and communication competence of vocational teachers. A comparative analysis of tools for assessing teachers’ media literacy is made. An overview of global and national trends in the development of digital competence of teachers, as well as the development and implementation of digital literacy programmes, is provided. Attention is paid to the role of the teacher as a facilitator, the problems of network security and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education. According to the results, the level of digital competence among teachers varied: 43.3% have a high level, 50% have an average level, and 6.7% have a low level. The main problems identified were insufficient knowledge of specialized software, lack of systematic training and technical support, and low motivation due to workload and stress. As part of the development of a programme to improve digital competence, the need to introduce compulsory courses in digital literacy, provide the necessary equipment and technical support, reduce the workload of teachers, and monitor successful international experience, such as regular courses and trainings, online courses, practical classes, project work, technical support and mentoring programmes; create communities for sharing experiences and a reward system to motivate teachers; organize effective feedback; and develop a system of teacher training and mentoring. The implementation of these recommendations is intended to help improve digital literacy and enhance the quality of education. The findings of the study can be used by the management of educational institutions to develop and implement programmes to improve the digital competence of teachers, which will improve the quality of the educational process and prepare students for the requirements of the modern digital society. These results may also be useful for state educational authorities in developing national standards and policies on digital literacy of teachers
Keywords
information and communication technologies; skills updating; facilitator; learning effectiveness; teacher reflection
References
[1] Armstrong, M., Jones, K., Namin, A.S., & Newton, D. (2020). Knowledge, skills, and abilities for specialised curricula in cyber defence: Results from interviews with cyber professionals. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(4), article number 29. doi: 10.1145/3421254.
[2] Azam, F., Shaheen, A., Shafi, R., & Amir, M. (2021). Student-centred or teacher-centred: Promises and pitfalls of online medical education. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons – Pakistan, 31(9), 1131-1132. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2021.09.1131.
[3] Bendler, D., & Felderer, M. (2023). Competency models for information security and cybersecurity professionals: Analysis of existing work and a new model. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(2), article number 25. doi: 10.1145/3573205.
[4] Bewersdorff, A., Zhai, X., Roberts J., & Nerdel, C. (2023). Myths, mis- and preconceptions of artificial intelligence: A review of the literature. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, article number 100143. doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100143.
[5] Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
[6] CHLOE-7: Tracking online learning from mainstream acceptance to universal adoption. The changing landscape of online education. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-7-Report-2022.pdf.
[7] Chounta, I.A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725-755. doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5.
[8] Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/.
[9] Dzvinchuk, D., & Ozminska, I. (2020). Educational trends of the XXI century. Educational Discourse, 21(3), 7-19. doi: 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.21(3)-1.
[10] Fan, S., Yu, Z., Zheng, X., & Gao, C. (2023). The relationship between psychological adaptability and work engagement of college teachers within smart teaching environments: The mediating role of digital information literacy self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, article number 1057158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1057158.
[11] Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Duckworth, D., & Friedman, T. (2019). IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 assessment framework. London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19389-8.
[12] Goncharenko, A., Diatlenko, N., & Polyakova, O. (2024). Integration of digital technologies into the educational process in a higher education institution: Challenges and practical aspects. Prospects and Innovations of Science, 4(38), 155-167. doi: 10.52058/2786-4952-2024-4(38)-155-168.
[13] International computer and information literacy study 2023. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.iea.nl/studies/iea/icils/2023.
[14] Iovchev, S., Savchuk, N., & Akopian, H. (2024). The role of technology in improving distance education: Innovative approaches and tools. Bulletin of Science and Education, 3(21), 136-148. doi: 10.52058/2786-6165-2024-3(21)-736-748.
[15] Kharytska, S., & Kolisnychenko, A. (2023). Search-informational competence of future biomedical engineers and economists as an important component of adjustment of safety professional activity standards. Prospects and Innovations of Science, 15(33), 38-54. doi: 10.52058/2786-4952-2023-15(33)-38-54.
[16] Koehler, M.J., & Punya, M. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.
[17] Koehler, M.J., & Punya, M. (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. New York: Routledge.
[18] Lewis, K.O., Popov, V., & Fatima, S.S. (2024). From static web to metaverse: Reinventing medical education in the post-pandemic era. Annals of Medicine, 56(1), article number 2305694. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2305694.
[19] Maghiar, M., & Brown, C. (2022). A qualitative multi-disciplinary analysis of employers’ technology competence perceptions for graduates readiness for the workforce. Cogent Education, 9(1), article number 2147777. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2147777.
[20] Marquardson, J., & Noshokaty, A. (2019). Skills, certifications, or degrees: What companies demand for entry-level cybersecurity jobs. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(1), 22-28.
[21] Mazur, C., Creech, C., Just, J., Rolle, C., Cotner, S., & Hewlett, J. (2021). Teaching during COVID-19 times: A community college perspective. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2459.
[22] Mohandas, L., Sorgenfrei, N., Drankoff, L., Sanchez, I., Furterer, S., Cudney, E., Laux, C., & Antony, J. (2022). Identifying factors that impact online teaching effectiveness during COVID-19. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(1), 44-59. doi: 10.1108/QAE-02-2022-0031.
[23] Mohanraj, J., Ooi Yuen, K., Eshvary, P., Sangwan, A., Thasya, A., Sahlan, N., Ashikin, N., & Kaur, H. (2019). Exploring the digital divide between pre-clinical teachers and students in an integrated medical curriculum from a Malaysian Private University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 1-9. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071901.
[24] Murray-Johnson, K., Santucci, A., & Goldsmith, D.J. (2021). Listening to the sound of silence in supporting instructors’ transitions to remote teaching during COVID-19. eLearn, 2, article number 2. doi: 10.1145/3452316.3451986.
[25] Nyathi, M., & Sibanda, E. (2023). E-learning: Substitutability of learner-learner, and learner-facilitator interactions to enhance learner satisfaction in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 16(2), 210-225. doi: 10.1108/JRIT-04-2022-0018.
[26] OECD. (2023). Building future-ready vocational education and training systems. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/28551a79-en.
[27] Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 167-r “On Approval of the Concept for the Development of Digital Competences and Approval of the Action Plan for its Implementation”. (2021, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/167-2021-%D1%80#n93.
[28] Ovsiienko, L. (2023). Smart technologies in the process of training a modern philologist. Prospects and Innovations of Science, 15(33), 367-377. doi: 10.52058/2786-4952-2023-15(33)-367-377.
[29] Perumal, M.N., Lenin, I., & Sivakumar, G. (2022). Emerging trends of ICT in teaching and learning. New Delhi: Insta Publishing.
[30] Polak, S., Schiavo, G., & Zancanaro, M. (2022). Teachers’ perspective on artificial intelligence education: An initial investigation. In CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems extended abstracts (pp. 1-7). doi: 10.1145/3491101.3519866.
[31] Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 184 “On Issues of the Unified State Digital Education Web Portal “Diia. Education””. (2024, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/184-2021-%D0%BF#Text.
[32] Riabets, K. (2024). Significance of web portal “Diia. Digital education” in public management of digital transformation. Scientific Herald: Public Administration, 1(15), 243-258. doi: 10.33269/2618-0065-2024-1(15)-243-258.
[33] Robert, J. (2024). 2024 Educause AI landscape study. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ecar/research-publications/2024/2024-educause-ai-landscape-study/introduction-and-key-findings.
[34] Schmidt, S., Hodge, E.M., & Tschida, C.M. (2020). How instructors learn to teach online: Considering the past to plan for the future. eLearn, 10, article number 2. doi: 10.1145/3429274.3425110.
[35] Tolochko, S. (2021). Digital competence of teachers in the conditions of digitalisation of educational institutions and distance learning. Bulletin of the T.H. Shevchenko National University “Chernihiv Colehium”, 169(13), 28-35. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.5077823.
[36] Zhang, C., & Villanueva, L. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence preparedness and technological competence: Towards a digital education teacher training programme. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11, 164-170. doi: 10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13753.